NikkiHaley

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Yes, there is a problem with the Employment Security Commission

Posted on 3:10 AM by Unknown
For months now, the debate about the South Carolina Employment Security Commission has raged on. During that time, VUI has held its tongue, so to speak, because, as the Editor, I do not like to write about things that personally affect me.

But, as the debate goes on, perhaps it is time to share the nightmare experience I had with the ESC. Maybe others can identify with what happened to me and my business and join in the demand for reform.

In the summer of 2009, my business received notification from the ESC that a man in Lexington County filed for unemployment benefits from my small business. The man had never been employed by my small business. No one in my business even knew who the man was. I took the form sent to me by the ESC to my local office, along with my forms showing the man never was employed by my business. I signed an appeal and the local people assured me that the matter was concluded and even shared my frustration.

It did not end there. Some weeks later, a letter was sent to my small business telling me that the man in question was approved by the Lexington County office to draw benefits and that my business’s account would be charged. If I challenged such, I was told by the letter to call a Columbia number.

Dutifully, I personally called that number for a better part of a business day. What I got was astounding. The number would ring and ring until it said, without offering voicemail, that no one was available to answer the call. At other times, the number would simply be busy. I grew frustrated and I had things to do. I ended up instructing my secretary to call the number until she got someone and to explain the situation.

Eventually, after a great deal of wasted time, my business reached someone and the problem was remedied. To the ESC’s credit, the money to my small business’s account was restored, and “knock on wood” our rates will not go up.

But, the problem is such a thing happened in the first place. How does the system allow someone who NEVER was employed by a business to draw benefits and drag out setting such right? How can a state agency charged with so much money be so incompetent? How can South Carolina be a friendly place for business when businesses have to spend so much time just trying to correct the government’s mistakes?

So, yes, there is a real problem with the Employment Security Commission. I learned it firsthand.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • The puzzling things around Leighton Lord's AG campaign
    Leighton Lord’s campaign for Attorney General has a boatload of money to spend. That is evidenced by the mail he has sent out already, his ...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (2)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (1)
  • ►  2012 (47)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (17)
    • ►  February (5)
    • ►  January (8)
  • ►  2011 (118)
    • ►  December (15)
    • ►  November (6)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (7)
    • ►  July (7)
    • ►  June (12)
    • ►  May (17)
    • ►  April (8)
    • ►  March (17)
    • ►  February (7)
    • ►  January (19)
  • ▼  2010 (283)
    • ►  December (16)
    • ►  November (8)
    • ►  October (23)
    • ►  September (18)
    • ►  August (19)
    • ►  July (20)
    • ►  June (37)
    • ►  May (28)
    • ►  April (23)
    • ►  March (20)
    • ▼  February (36)
      • College sports recruiting is out of control
      • Top 9 Things that WILL NOT be cut from the SC Budget
      • What is happening to good ole high school basketball?
      • Yes, there is a problem with the Employment Securi...
      • It appears that Haley sees Barrett as her primary foe
      • Spratt is in trouble and other Congressional race ...
      • RIP, Al Haig
      • The Obama economic health care plan
      • Top 9 things most people do not care about
      • Do we have it in us to be like Churchill?
      • More election year BS from the SC House
      • Good grief, Mr. Eckstrom, leave Charlie Brown out ...
      • The Upstate's Southern Connector is in default
      • Obama to South Carolina: "Let it glow."
      • VUI video of the week runner up: a tribute to poli...
      • VUI Video of the week: Johnny Paycheck
      • President's Day Tribute: Chester A. Arthur
      • We have seen this before people
      • Lincoln
      • Top 9 things said to politicians that offer little...
      • A nightmare under Pascoe
      • Texting and Driving and the big distraction
      • RIP Charlie Wilson and thank you
      • Why leftists bash Christians
      • Hey PETA, leave those kids alone
      • The Sanfords do not define South Carolina
      • Remembering Reagan
      • State government problems are more about competenc...
      • Top 9 books as interesting to read as Jenny Sanford's
      • We remain at war
      • We don't give a damn about your sex life
      • It's our job to clean up the local government mess...
      • Censuring the notorious Earl Capps
      • Will Obama reverse "Don't Fart. Don't Smell?"
      • Someone out there has to be thinking about getting...
      • Ahmadinejad throwing a tantrum again
    • ►  January (35)
  • ►  2009 (50)
    • ►  December (35)
    • ►  November (15)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile